Technology and Physical Education



April 23, 2002,
Vol. 4, No.8

Conference/Workshop Calendar


 Editorial

Featured this week are reports from some of the 2002 AAHPERD Convention presentations. Perhaps you were one of the several thousand professionals in PEHLS who converged on San Diego for another successful convention? If not, and especially if you have never been to a national convention, we do encourage you to try to plan to attend in a future year.

In addition to offering hundreds of worthwhile presentations, simply attending the national convention is always an uplifting and motivating experience. Back in our hometowns it is easy to feel isolated and doubt the importance of our work promoting active and healthy lifestyles.

For many of us the best part of these conventions is meeting with colleagues and catching up with news from around the country.

Thanks to those of you who took time to stop by the PELINKS4U booth in the exhibit hall and say, "Hi." Despite statistics that suggest our site is being heavily visited we too sometimes wonder about the impact we are having. We were amused and pleasantly surprised when one teacher simply walked past remarking to no one in particular, "Oh, PELINKS4U. I visit that all the time."

We hope that PELINKS4U is helping you and we certainly appreciate your feedback. It does take a lot of work to produce and we couldn't do it without the contributions of more than 30 volunteer editiors and those of you who send us news updates and contributions.

Hopefully, we will get a chance to meet in person at a future convention. In case you didn't know future conventions will be:

  • 2003 Philadelphia
  • 2004 Chicago
  • 2005 New Orleans

Finally, we hope you enjoy the convention information we are featuring on this page. If you are planning to apply for a PEP grant be sure to read tips presented by last year's award winners. You might also be interested to read about criticism directed at the PE profession and charges that its mission is "muddled." Finally, we've all heard about Navy SEALS but San Diego conventioneers heard first hand from the man who for many years directed this program.

Enjoy!

Steve Jefferies
Convention Section Editor 


 Lessons of the Navy SEALS

The Only Easy Day Was Yesterday: A Lesson From the Navy SEALS

At the opening of the first General Session of the 2002 AAHPERD Convention, Rear Admiral Ray Smith, former commander of the 2300-man Navy SEAL force described the SEAL training process. More than just a test of physical endurance Rear Admiral Smith explained how SEAL training, similar to education, was a process of transforming character.

The program has several key characteristics:

  1. Experiencing Multi-Dimensional Stress
  2. SEAL participants quickly learn that simply being physically superior is not enough. They learn that success depends on the ability to control one's physical, emotional, and mental abilities.

    Immediately these recruits experience success, the SEAL program raises the challenge, hence the title of this presentation, "The only easy day was yesterday." According to Smith, in life we need to be realistic regarding the expectations we hold of others otherwise their performance invariably decreases.

  3. Normalizing the Abnormal
  4. Similar to principles of teaching progression, as SEALS learn to cope with and adapt to stressful situations, they face greater challenges. In essence Smith described this a "normalizing the abnormal." In other words things that were initially major challenges eventually become normal, and recruits move on to higher challenges.

  5. Experiencing the Leadership Prism
  6. During SEAL training, officers and enlisted men must do everything together. There is a belief that officers are made rather than born and SEAL trainers strive to develop leadership skills in three dimensions: upwards, with peers, and downwards. Smith noted that we typically underestimate other people's abilities and that true leadership demanded a commitment to those we lead.

  7. Teamwork

    According to Smith, "No one goes through SEAL training alone." He explained that SEAL trainers like educators need to build a culture of teamwork for their graduates to be successful

To read the complete article click here
 Writing a Successful PEP Grant

One of the most popular sessions at the 2002 AAHPERD Convention was a presentation by last year’s PEP grant recipients. A packed room of PEP hopefuls listened intently as their colleagues shared grant-writing tips. Shown below are a sample of their suggestions. To read the complete article click here..

How to Begin the Grant Writing Process

  • Begin early! Rather than wait for the publication of PEP grant guidelines start a "Needs Assessment" in your district immediately and begin developing a proposal strategy.
  • Surround yourself with others who are interested in program development and positive about change.
  • Look for community partnerships. Task forces will assist and help to sustain the grant. Consider inviting the medical community.

Choosing a Project Title

While a "catchy" project title may not be the decisive factor in any grant application it may help reviewers to remember your proposal ahead of others that they review. Here’s a sample from last year’s successful PEP grants:

  • Project Inshape
  • PE for Progress
  • 21st Century PE

Developing a Budget

  • Working closely with your district Business Office to ensure that proper rates, overheads etc., are included in your budget.
  • Be sure to include funds in your grant to administer the grant. Although most teachers are concerned that funds are devoted to purchases that affect their students it is a mistake to ignore the need for someone to administer the grant.

Establishing the Need for the Grant

  • Use any unique data that your school district has been collecting in your grant application. For example, in 2001 one district had data that showed students of color and low income had significantly higher levels of obesity and health problems. Another district had data suggesting a positive correlation between physical activity, obesity, and increased behavioral problems. Does your state have any unique data? Wisconsin for example had its "Wisconsin Indicators for School Health." This data showed a state increase in obesity among children ages 2-5.
  • Use the President’s Challenge, Fitnessgram, Physical Best, or other fitness data that your district has probably accumulated. from years of physical fitness testing
  • Use national research and statistics to support your application. The Center for Disease Control (CDC) is a good starting point for national data. The "School Health Index" and the "Youth Risk Behavior Survey" are especially useful. National data is helpful to supplement an absence of any local data.

How to Incorporate State and National Standards

  • Show in your proposal that you are aware of, and plan to work towards local (state) and national standards
  • If appropriate explain how you are endeavoring to transform your curriculum from traditional activity offerings to those being promoted as part of the "new" physical education.
  • One way to ease this transition is to consider building standardized instructional units with guidelines that all teachers will follow.

Characteristics of the 2001 PEP Grant Recipients

Summarized below are some of the characteristics of last year's successful applications. Be sure to remember that the ideas presented are from many different proposals!

  • "Project Inshape" presented the premise that quality PE would improve academic performance.
  • The "PE for Progress" proposal established a unique urban and rural partnership. Its primary goal was simply to increase the time spent in PE by emphasizing that fitness was an individual rather than group responsibility.
  • A program in Massachusetts was designed to combat childhood obesity. It proposed to increase professional development opportunities for PE teachers and train paraprofessionals to implement physical activity opportunities into the school day. A community outreach program was also included.
  • Many schools used this grant to increase limited supplies of equipment and especially technology. Typically, these requests were accompanied by plans to transform the curriculum and offer different activities.

To read the complete article click here



Physical Education Research and Practice

Ready, Set, Let's Jump the Chasm Between Research and Practice

(At Tuesday evening's opening Convention ceremony, Dr. James Sallis, a San Diego State University professor of clinical psychology delivered the R. Tait McKenzie lecture.)

Sallis opened by first admitting that although his research focused on health-related issues he was not a physical educator. This he claimed gave him a different professional perspective and had led him to some disturbing conclusions about the direction physical education appeared to be headed.

Rather than a gap between research and practice Sallis characterized current differences as a chasm. He feared that the decline in resources and requirements in PE was having a serious negative effect on children.

Sallis claimed that advocacy in physical education was currently based more on wishful thinking that on evidence. He noted that bad or inappropriate PE practices were visible and tolerated everywhere. Physical education, he argued, did not have clear goals and claimed that he was not alone in perceiving the "Muddled Mission of PE."

Sallis criticized PE research as being mostly irrelevant to practice. Too frequently it was focused on details and ignored bigger issues affecting practice. He pointed out that ironically, there have been many excellent studies supporting the importance of PE yet none conducted by PE professionals.

In the future he suggested that physical educators should begin to use evidence based on practice to guide curriculum decisions and to avoid writing standards that were not based on solid supporting data. This he believed would increase the accountability of the PE profession.

Even our national association - AAHPERD - did not base the standards and practices it proposed on research-based physical education Sallis argued. Health, he again asserted was physical education's best selling point.

Sallis concluded his thought-provoking presentation by suggesting that teaching professionals should be implementing programs that were based on research and had data to prove their effectiveness - thereby closing the chasm currently existing between research and practice.

To read the complete article click here






Join more than 10,000 subscribers currently receiving a biweekly e-mail posting of the latest PELINKS4U news.

Enter your email address below, then click the 'Sign Up' button:

 

 




 Contribute YOUR Ideas

If you have ideas, comments, letters to share, or questions about particular topics, please email one of the following Technology Section Editors:

Debby Mitchell
Gerry Cernicky
Michael W. Dumin





Questions to Ask, or
Thoughts to Share?


 

Management, Pedometers, and Promoting Lifestyle Activity



Is your program using pedometers to promote activity? At this year's convention several presentations focused on ways that pedometers can motivate children to be more active. There were also many more pedometer vendors among the exhibits. One of these vendors is New Lifestyles a PELINKS4U Site Sponsor. Visit the New Lifestyles web site for more information.

 

Home | Adapted PE | Archives | Calendar | Coaching | Contributors | Elementary PE | Health, Fitness & Nutrition
Feedback | Interdisciplinary PE | Links |PE Forum | PE News | Secondary PE | Site Sponsorship
Book Reviews | Store | Technology in PE
jjjjj
E-mail:  pelinks@pelinks4u.org | Fax/Phone 509-925-4175 | Copyright © 1999-2001 | PELINKS4U   All Rights Reserved