FUTURE
SPORT, EXERCISE AND PHYSICAL EDUCATION
PROFESSIONALS' PERCEPTIONS OF THE PHYSICAL
SELF OF OBESE CHILDREN
By Derek
M. Peters, and Ruan
J.A. Jones
continued
from page one... (page
1) (page 2)
Kinesiology:
International Journal of Fundamental
and Applied Kinesiology
(2010) 42(1): 36-43. The journal abstract
and full length article can be downloaded
at: Hrcak
Portal of scientific journals of Croatia.
Procedure
The survey was distributed to approximately
300 students studying sports-related,
sport science, and physical education
programmes in higher education in England.
Data from the 167 completed and returned
surveys (participation rate of approximately
56%) were entered into the Statistical
Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)
version 14. Body mass
index was calculated from the participant’s
self-reported height and weight (kg
.m2) and participants were categorized
as underweight (BMI<20), normal weight
(BMI 20-24.99), overweight (BMI 25-29.99)
or obese (BMI>30).
The responses
to each item of the adapted CY-PSPP
were coded as 1 for the really
true option that identified lowest
relative perception compared to their
perception of normal-weight kids,
2 for the sort of true
option that identified a lower relative
perception compared to their perception
of normal-weight kids, 3
for the sort of true option
that identified a higher relative perception
compared to their perception of normal-weight
kids and 4 for the really
true option that identified the
highest relative perception compared
to their perception of normal-weight
kids.
The mean
for each subscale was then calculated
by adding together the responses to
the six items that made up the subscale
and dividing this by 6. Only a mean
score for the subscale of 2.5 would
therefore identify equivocal perception
of fat compared to normal-weight
kids.
Data
analysis
Reliability of the six subscales of
the adapted CY-PSPP was investigated
using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients with acceptable internal consistency
identified as a>=.7 (Ntoumanis,
2001).
One sample
t-tests, which identify if
the mean of a subscale is significantly
different from a fixed value were used
to identify whether the subscale means
achieved were significantly different
to 2.5 (the subscale mean value that
would suggest an equivocal perception
of fat versus normal-weight
kids). Significant difference with
a mean value above 2.5 would, therefore,
indicate a positive bias for the perception
of fat kids compared to normal-weight
kids, i.e., that the perceptions towards
the fat kids in the subscale were more
favorable than those held towards the
normal weight kids. Significant difference
with a mean value less than 2.5 would
indicate a negative bias for the perception
of fat kids compared with normal-weight
kids, i.e., that the perceptions held
towards the fat kids in the subscale
were less favorable than those held
towards the normal-weight kids. Also
calculated were effect size (eta2),
95% confidence intervals and the percentage
of respondents who had a mean score
lower than 2.5 for each subscale.
Group differences
using the demographic variables as grouping
variables were investigated for each
subscale using independent sample t-tests
for sex differences (male, female),
and one-way ANOVA for year of study
(first, second, third, fourth year)
and BMI category (underweight, normal
weight, overweight, obese) differences.
Results
Cronbach’s alpha for the subscales
were calculated as CONDITION a=.85;
BODY a=.74; PSW a=.83; SPORT a=.78;
GSE a=.80 and STRENGTH a=.86 and the
internal reliability of all of the subscales
of the adapted CY-PSPP was therefore
deemed to be good. Mean (±SD)
for each subscale, results of one-sample
t-tests (t, df, p), mean difference,
effect size - eta2 (if significant
difference is apparent), 95% lower and
upper confidence intervals and the
percentage of respondents with a subscale
mean score below the equivocal score
of 2.5 are shown in Table 1.
It is evident
from Table 1 that subscale means for
all except the STRENGTH subscale were
significantly lower than the equivocal
perception value of 2.5, indicating
the presence of significant anti-fat
perceptions in the CONDITION, BODY,
PSW, SPORT and GSE subscales. The majority
of participants also had mean subscale
scores lower than 2.5 for each of these
five subscales. Only the STRENGTH subscale
showed no significant anti-fat bias
and a greater percentage of participants
having mean scores above the 2.5 value
(49%) than below
(41%).
Results of
t-test and ANOVA analyses (with alpha
set at p<.05), identified that no
significant subscale differences were
present between the groups created from
each of the demographic variables, i.e.,
there were no significant sex differences,
year group differences or BMI category
differences apparent for any of the
subscales (the results of these analyses
are therefore not presented). This identified
that the perceptions held towards fat
kids compared to normal-weight
kids were relatively universal
across the sample regardless of sex,
year of study and participant BMI category.

Discussion
and conclusions
These data support previous
findings of anti-fat bias in samples
of practising health professionals,
exercise science and PE students and
PE teachers in the USA and New Zealand.
As an extension to the literature, the
data provides direct evidence that anti-fat
bias is evident in relation to fat children,
with perceptions of the physical self
of fat children held by the participants
being significantly lower for body image,
sport competence, physical condition,
physical self-worth and global self-esteem
(Table 1 above).
Only perception
of the strength of fat children was
found to be equivocal to the strength
perception of normal-weight children,
a feature which reflects the research
of Greenleaf and Weiller (2005) who
found the smallest differential between
expectancies of overweight and normal
weight youth to be in relation to their
strength self-description items. The
perception of equivocal strength and,
indeed, the finding that a larger percentage
of participants (49%) identified fat
children as greater in the strength
subscale than normal-weight children
(41% less) could be suggested as either
causing, or potentially being resultant
from, obese children being more comfortable
performing, being encouraged towards,
or even being targeted to participate
in, activities in sport, exercise and
physical activity settings that require
strength rather than activities that
require endurance or physical conditioning.
None of the
demographic variables were found to
significantly moderate the anti-fat
perceptions held, and there was no relationship
found between age and subscale means
(although this may stem from the relatively
homogenous age of the sample). As such,
it would appear that gender, current
weight status, and year of study had
no significant impact upon the level
of anti-fat bias with groups of students
on the sport, exercise and physical
education courses holding similar negative
perceptions of fat children when compared
with their normal-weight peers.
Further research
is necessary to establish whether these
data are unique to future sport, exercise,
and PE professionals, and to establish
if these perceptions become even more
negative towards obese children as students
progress through potentially body-oriented
educational programmes. Indeed, the
impact of experience and 'exposure'
to the rising levels of childhood obesity
should be explored. This may be possible
through sampling of professionals with
a far greater range of years of experience
gained while childhood obesity levels
have been rising. Indeed, physical education
teachers may present the most important
population to examine as they constitute
the only profession required to deliver
quality physical activity opportunities
to ALL children of school age and who
arguably have had the most exposure
to the rising levels of childhood obesity.
Appreciation
of the findings from the current study
alongside previous studies (Schwartz,
et al., 2003; Wadden, et al., 2000)
has serious implications for the possible
impact of negative perceptions of obese
children in sport, exercise and physical
education settings. These implications
may be heightened still further if obese
children are as perceptive as obese
women in sensing such lack of understanding
in those purported to be supporting
them.
International
comparative research is also required
to investigate potential international
differences in perceptions and the underlying
causation of such perceptions in different
national contexts that may exist in
many facets of sport, exercise, and
physical education training and philosophy.
Following
identification of the anti-fat perceptions
held towards fat children by healthcare,
sport, exercise and physical education
trainees and professionals, the issue
remains whether such perceptions actually
do manifest into negative behaviours
towards obese children in settings designed
to promote and inculcate sport, exercise,
and physical activity enjoyment and
participation. Theory and previous research
has identified the ability of negative
implicit attitudes to predict future
prejudicial behaviours towards the target
group.
The identification
of negative perceptions of the physical
self of obese children, the lower expectations
and anticipation of lower physical ability
held by sport, exercise, and physical
education specialists toward obese children
and adolescents is therefore alarming.
The potential for these to develop into
discriminatory, damaging behaviours
toward obese children and adolescents
is not beyond question. Investigation
of the ramifications that these perceptions
and subsequent negative behaviours may
have upon the obese child's physical
and psychological health and likelihood
of participating in sport, exercise,
and physical activity in the near and
distant future is, therefore, of paramount
importance.
In synergizing
the findings from this and other previous
studies into anti-fat attitudes in such
physical ability focused specialists,
the suggestion by Jalongo (1999) that
obesity should be considered a 'diversity'
issue would seem to warrant serious
consideration in such settings. The
current findings therefore add further
support to calls from previous authors
for the development of obesity awareness
programmes and materials to attempt
to change the anti-fat bias held by
frontline healthcare, sport, exercise
and physical education professionals
(Gately 2007;
Greenleaf & Weiller 2005; O'Brien, et
al., 2007). Such intervention
tools for use in sport, exercise and
physical education environments would
need to develop from appreciation of
not only the 'experiences of obesity'
in relation to health and well-being,
but specifically the experiences of
obesity in direct relation to sport,
exercise and physical education settings.
In addition,
the findings from the current study
explicitly identify that intervention
programmes are necessary for those who
deal specifically with children and
adolescents. The inclusion of training,
modules and discourse on obesity
appreciation issues within the
initial training and continuing professional
development of sport, exercise and physical
education professionals may be of paramount
importance not only for enhancing the
immediate engagement of overweight and
obese children and adolescents in physical
activity, exercise and sport and their
enjoyment of the experience, but also
for increasing the likelihood of overweight
and obese children and adolescents adopting
a physically active lifestyle into adulthood.
References
to this article.
|