CONSIDERATIONS FOR DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAMS

Written by: Michael W. Beets, Dept of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina

The importance of afterschool programs in providing youth opportunities to be physically active cannot be overstated. With over 6.6 million youth attending ASPs, for an average of 6.7 hours per week, the focus on promoting physical activity within the ASP setting has become a natural extension to the activity-related opportunities youth receive during school (Smith, 2007). Afterschool programs offer the convenience of a more flexible schedule (in relation to the school day), are a safe environment for youth to engage in activity, and importantly, can provide up to a third of the recommended 60 minutes each day of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Hence, ASPs represent a setting within which physical activity can be infused.

The ASPs referred to herein are those that serve school-age children, occur after school (3-6pm), and are not single-activity focused (e.g., academic tutoring or sports, solely). Such programs have a long history of positive youth development and are best known for the social, emotional, and academic benefits youth receive from attending (Durlak & Weissberg, 2007).

With a new focus on physical activity in ASPs, practitioners are left with the question as to how to “successfully” introduce physical activity into their ASP schedule. We know that from our own review (Beets, Beighle, Erwin, & White, 2009), such questions are not easily answered, nor are they easily addressed by purchasing any one of a number of ASP physical activity-related programs available on the market today. This is not to say that purchasing an already developed program will not result in increased physical activity. Contrary, we believe that successful attempts towards increasing physical activity within the ASP setting have a common core of shared elements that, with careful consideration, will result in improved physical activity. These are discussed below.

Physical Activity Types

State-level afterschool organizations have outlined benchmarks related to physical activity. These range anywhere from general guidelines of 30 minutes of activity for every 3 hours of program time to directly specifying the time and intensity of physical activity (e.g., 30-60 minutes of MVPA or 20% of program time dedicated to MVPA). Ultimately, we want kids to be active. Thus any amount of bodily movement is good movement. But primarily, we want kids to be engaged in activities that increases their heart rate and breathing, and maybe even makes them sweat - MVPA. Hence, the selection of activities that elicit such a response are important to incorporate. Examples of these might include non-elimination tag games and modified sports games the minimize inactivity. For example, rather than play traditional soccer, use 3-4 teams, 3-4 goals in the corners, and 3-4 balls. For tag games, rather than freezing or having to sit out, students that are tagged become the new tagger.

The selection of activities, however, should not be without care. Kids like physical activities that are enjoyable. Moreover, kids from different cultural backgrounds will enjoy different types of activities. Both of these issues - enjoyment and cultural tailoring - should be considered in the selection process. One strategy to determine the appropriateness of activities is to ask for feedback, either formally using a customer feedback system or informally through anecdotal comments made by kids during the activities.

Staff Training

Frontline staffers, those hired to directly interact with the kids attending ASPs, are an essential feature to promoting physical activity (Beighle, et al., in press). In fact, in a joint state effort, Kansas and Missouri have outlined core competencies that explicitly address what frontline staffers should know and do to promote physical development during ASPs (Kansas Enrichment Network or Missouri Afterschool Network). Of this, receiving training in instructional skills related to promoting physical activity are paramount.

First and foremost, afterschool programs should have ongoing training. This training should consist of how to establish an environment that promotes physical activity and examines, and possibly challenges, staff values, attitudes, and beliefs towards physical activity. Additionally, training should be accompanied by a well defined manual that consists of detailed descriptions of activities to use within the ASP. And as with any training, booster session will be required to ensure ongoing skill development of staff.

Evaluation

Few ASPs perform some type of routine evaluation of the activity levels their attendees obtain during their program. If physical activity is to become a major component of an ASP and benchmarks related to minimal levels of physical activity achieved, consistent evaluation is required. Measuring activity levels should not be done haphazardly. Unless you (or a member of your ASP staff) have received professional training, direct observation (watching the kids) of activity levels will not provide a good estimate. Likewise, self-report assessments (kids reporting their activity level) are not recommended. This is due to the inability of kids to accurately recall their activity and their inability to recall intensity level (low, moderate, or vigorous).

This leaves ASPs with two options - heart rate monitors and pedometers. The former of these can provide an accurate assessment of activity intensity and duration. Additionally, many new heart rate monitors can collect information over the duration of the program and be downloaded to a computer for evaluation. Some of the drawbacks to their use are the need to have the chest straps directly touching the wearer’s skin.

Second, hear rate monitors are fairly expensive (~$80 each). Price is likely to prevent ASPs from purchasing multiple units, thus evaluation of multiple youth on the same day may be prohibited. Moreover, for an accurate assessment of heart rate response to physical activity, a wearer’s resting heart rate is required. Hence, a preliminary step is required prior to accurately determining activity intensity. The second option, pedometers, is relatively free from the aforementioned limitations. Pedometers are relatively inexpensive (~$10-50 each), affix to the waistline of pants or shorts, and provide the wearer (or ASP provider) immediate information without the need for additional software or hardware. Importantly, new technology has recently been introduced that allows pedometers to measure physical activity intensity (i.e., MVPA).

The importance of evaluating physical activity levels cannot be overstated. The development of benchmarks for physical activity at the state level is a clear indication that national guidelines are likely to follow. Afterschool providers should, therefore, be proactive in collecting this information. With this in hand, ASPs can identify areas of the program where youth are insufficiently active and, conversely, areas where they exceed. Importantly, ASPs can begin to chart their own progress towards achieving the benchmarks outlined by their state afterschool organization (e.g., Afterschool Alliance state chapter).

In conclusion, ASPs are increasingly being called upon to incorporate opportunities for physical activity. With attention paid to these core components discussed herein, ASP providers can successfully incorporate and evaluate physical activity within their programs.

references

(pelinks4u home)


 

 
 
 

home | site sponsorships | naspe forum | submit idea or experience | pe store | calendar | e-mail

Copyright © of PELINKS4U  | All Rights Reserved