Recently I received a promotion for a pedometer. It was touted
as a product that would help reverse the national downward slide
toward a sedentary lifestyle, make exercise fun and that after using
it, the biggest problem teachers would have is getting their students
to stop moving. After reading it and seeing a TV spot on how heart
monitors and resistance machines got kids enthusiastic about moving
again, I thought about the danger of placing too much emphasis on
gizmos and not enough on fundamentals.
We need to teach activities that will keep kids moving through a
lifetime. Boredom certainly will not do it. I see this technology
fix as a fad that endangers our mission if overused.
Maybe I am egocentric, but I have a heart rate monitor and hardly
ever use it. After I learned what it felt like to stay in my desired
heart rate range I don't have to. I also have a cyclometer which
I took on my typical bicycling run. I was quite excited about it
the first few times. I checked my speed, mileage and time but then
after a few days, realized it did not change very much from day
to day, so hardly look at it now. For sure, heart rate monitor and
cyclometers are great for an initial stimulus and to teach us what
we need to know about our body, but they do not make activity more
fun and are certainly could never qualify as the things that keep
me moving.
What does it for me is habit, awareness of my needs, looking forward
to a good social experience, expecting to have some fun and having
a variety of activities I enjoy. I attribute the last three as the
primary reasons moving became a habit. I suspect kids and I have
a lot in common in that respect. Please remember that as you plan
your curriculum.
Isobel Kleinman
Secondary Section Editor

|