"THE STUDENTS ARE NOISY AND MOVING AROUND"
NASPE Physical Education Teacher Evaluation Tool,
Written by: Krista Winn

I remember sitting down in the principal’s office to go over my teaching evaluation. I had just completed my first year of teaching, and I was excited to receive feedback on what I thought had been a very successful year. But, the principal started the conversation with, “I really should give you an ‘unsatisfactory.’ Your students were noisy and moving around.”

Noisy? Moving around? Was he kidding? This was PHYSICAL Education! However, these types of comments are typical when an administrator without a physical education background uses a classroom-based tool to evaluate physical education teachers. Feedback, if any, is oftentimes meaningless and not appropriate for our subject area.

In my school district, the evaluation form has two boxes: unsatisfactory or satisfactory. That’s it! For the past 25 years I have been satisfactory. Even after being named the NASPE 2006 National Elementary Physical Education Teacher of the Year my evaluation said “satisfactory.” Good thing to know.

Are you tired of receiving the basic evaluation form that says you are “satisfactory?” Would you like more feedback on your teaching skills and the quality of your program? NASPE has developed a Physical Education Teacher Evaluation Tool to help building administrators provide meaningful feedback that identifies the knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed to provide sound instruction in the K-12 physical education classroom.

The evaluation tool provides a thorough assessment of instruction, evidence of student learning, management/organization, learning climate, and professionalism. Each category has several statements that are evaluated on a 5-point scale. At first this tool can be overwhelming. The basic idea is to provide the school administration with an instrument designed to provide a meaningful evaluation and appropriate feedback on specific criteria. I suggest that you introduce the tool to your administrator one step at a time. Here is one example:

Choose a theme that you would like to focus on for the first year. Create a table of criteria that lists the appropriate components from the evaluation tool. Modify the table(s) each year to add a new theme. The combinations are endless. For example:

Year 1: Standards

Theme: Standards
Component
Description
Mid-Year Score
End of Year Score
1a
Instruction is based on local, state and/or national physical education standards.
2a
Assessment is based on mastery of learning expectations which are aligned with local, state and national standards.    
3a
Lesson plans and curriculum are aligned with current local, state, and national standards.    
4a
Lifelong physical activity and skillful movement are promoted.    
5a
Teacher is a lifelong learner within the profession.    

Year 2: Feedback and Standards

Theme: Feedback
Component
Description
Mid-Year Score
End of Year Score
1l
Specific, meaningful and timely feedback is provided to students.
2j
Student progress is documented in a retrievable record-keeping system.    
3h
Appropriate behaviors are reinforced consistently.    
4h
Students are recognized and praised for efforts and positive contributions.    
5d
Teacher is receptive to feedback and seeks opportunities for personal growth.    

Year 3: Assessment, Feedback, and Standards

Theme: Assessment
Component
Description
Mid-Year Score
End of Year Score
1n
Student performance is continually assessed to guide instruction.
2c
There is ongoing formal and informal assessment.    
3b
Grading is based on assessment of student learning.    
4p
Accurate records are maintained.    
5c
High expectations for learning and behavior are evident.    

The NASPE Physical Education Teacher Evaluation Tool is a useful tool for physical education teachers and administrators. It can be used in its entirety for a formal in-depth evaluation or modified to focus on individual components or criteria. The results of the observation/evaluation utilizing the NASPE tool will provide valuable information on the knowledge, skills, and behaviors for quality physical education teachers and programs.

      Students are noisy? Check out criteria 1i, 1k, 4b and 4g!
      Students are moving around the gym? Check out criteria 3n!
      Satisfactory? Outstanding!!

(pelinks4u home)


 

 
 
 

home | site sponsorships | naspe forum | submit idea or experience | pe store | calendar | e-mail

Copyright © of PELINKS4U  | All Rights Reserved