"Developing Skillful and Healthy Movers"

With the right attitude limitations vanish, for a person's state of mind is always self-given

Home
News
Teaching
Fitness
Advocacy
Technology
Miscellaneous
Feedback

Links Index
* Adapted Physical Education
* Athletic Training
* Biomechanics
* Dance
* Exercise Science
* Health Sciences
* Outdoor and Adventure Education
* Pedagogy - Teaching Methods
* Sport Psychology
* Sport Management
* Statistics and Measurement
16. Physical Education Advocacy
17. References and Resources
18. Unit Plans - Online Teaching Units
19. PELINKS4U Archives

20. PE-Forum - Online Bulletin Board


?Suggest New Links?





Your LOGO Here!
Expose your products to 1000's of PE, Health, and Fitness Professionals each month!



PELINKS4U Site Search

Want past issues of PELINKS4U? Check the PELINKS4U Archives

"Adventure Project Proposal"
(Submitted by Dave Lockett, 12/799)


Greetings,

I would like to propose a project that I believe would be of value to all of us. The need I have identified is not a new one. I work in a public school setting where it has become more common that participants engaged in adventure learning activities have already in previous programs been involved in a given initiative. How many participants have already done the spider's web. The standard argument for the more experienced facilitator goes something like this:

The real agenda here really has nothing to do with the activity itself. In fact the activity is really arbitrary, although certain activities due seem to lend themselves to specific issues. But we are facilitators of group process, not of activities. I am a member of this group and really do in part feel this way. I know that I spend much of my time in philosophy dialogue with the teachers I work with trying to get this idea across.

Well unfortunately this is not how things really work, at least in public education. Teachers with a few years of experience do not have the background to make those types of adjustments and it will go right over the heads of kids. My proposal is simple: collect variations of activities of all types and develop a manuscript that will be distributed to the creators. I will make all information I collect available to every person who contributes. Initially I will create a web site with an address that will be available and any person can access the information while it is in the development stage. I foresee this process taking a year or two to give it justice. Second, I plan to produce a manuscript possibly published that will be made available. I believe this project would benefit the entire continuum, from entry level to advanced facilitator.

You may mail your ideas to:

Stevenšs Point School District
c/o David Lockett, Director of PE & Experiential Learning
BLISS EWSC
1900 Polk Street
Stevens Point WI, 54481

If it is more convenient to E-mail my address is: DLOCKETT@WISP.K12.WI.US

Here is a sample format as well as an example of what my vision is for this project

Activity: Spiders Web
Submitted by: David Lockett, Stevens Point WI
Target age group:
Date: 11-2-99

Variation 1
Your group has the task of getting from this side of the web to the other side. You must not touch the lines at any time. Touching the lines would be a breach of the specific task parameters and consequences are involved. Once a member of your group has successfully negotiated a hole you may not use that hole again unless that member returns to start over (due to a prescribed consequence) which will result in the hole reopening. You may not go over the top line and you may not go under the bottom line. The two trees on either side are your right and left boundaries. Remember quality is defined as not touching the lines. Your group must contract up front how many holes you feel can be completed prior to the start of the activity.

Variation 2:
General rules: Your group has the task of getting from this side of the web to the other side. You must not touch the lines at any time. Touching the lines would be a breach of the specific task parameters and consequences are involved. Once a member of your group has successfully negotiated a hole you may not use that hole again unless that member returns to start over (due to a prescribed consequence) which will result in the hole reopening. You may not go over the top line and you may not go under the bottom line. The two trees on either side are your right and left boundaries. Remember quality is defined as not touching the lines. Any touch of the lines results in the person being passed through returning to start over.

Variation 3:
Your group has the task of getting from this side of the web to the other side. You must not touch the lines at any time. Touching the lines would be a breach of the specific task parameters and consequences are involved. Once a member of your group has successfully negotiated a hole you may not use that hole again unless that member returns to start over (due to a prescribed consequence) which will result in the hole reopening. You may not go over the top line and you may not go under the bottom line. The two trees on either side are your right and left boundaries. Remember quality is defined as not touching the lines. Your group has three levels of consequence while completing this problem. You must choose what level under which your group will operate before starting. You may change levels only once during this activity.

Level one: If the lines are touched the person going thought the hole must start over.
Level two: If the lines are touched the person going thought the hole must start over plus 1/2 of all the people who have already made in though to the other side of the web.
Level Three: If the lines are touched the entire group must start over.

Variation 4:
Your group has the task of getting from this side of the web to the other side. You must not touch the lines at any time. Touching the lines would be a breach of the specific task parameters and consequences are involved. Once a member of your group has successfully negotiated a hole you may not use that hole again unless that member returns to start over (due to a prescribed consequence) which will result in the hole reopening. You may not go over the top line and you may not go under the bottom line. The two trees on either side are your right and left boundaries. Remember quality is defined as not touching the lines. Your group has three levels of consequence while completing this problem. You must choose what level under which your group will operate before starting. You may change levels only once during this activity.

Level one: If the lines are touched the person going thought the hole must start over.
Level two: If the lines are touched the person going thought the hole must start over plus 1/2 of all the people who have already made in though to the other side of the web.
Level Three: If the lines are touched the entire group must start over.

This activity is based upon a point system. The total points possible is based upon the number of people times the highest level, in this case level three. Each person successfully making in through a hole receives the points for that level. A person going through on level one gets one point while a person going though the same hole on level three gets 3 points. A group of ten would have a range of 10-30 points assuming every person participates. Your group must contract up front., within acceptable error, how many points you feel are possible prior to starting. You must also define to the facilitator what your definition of acceptable error is before starting.

Variation 5:
Utilize any combination of the above rules. Construct a three-sided spider's web. Ask a consultant from each group to come forward to receive the rules. Three groups will work either independently or together on three simultaneously running webs.

 


Send comments on this article to Dave Lockett

E-mail: pelinks@pelinks4u.org
Copyright © 1999
PELINKS4U
All Rights Reserved