
Debra D'Acquisto
|
As a fitness
professional and physical educator you
may be asked some seemingly "out-of-
the-blue" questions such as, "What
do I do for the best exercise?"
"How long do I have to work out?"
"How hard do I have to work?"
"How do I drop body weight?"
These questions may be laced with overzealous
misconceptions such as, "I don't
have an hour a day to exercise."
Or, "I heard you have to do 3 days
of cardio and 3 days of lifting weights,
and then stretch or do yoga; I don't
have that kind of time, so why bother?"
And, a question or comment that refers
to intensity may sound like, "I
can't keep up with the (fill in the
blank) _______________ (aerobic class,
the joggers, the noontime walkers, the
spinning group, etc)."
Many people
drop-out or refrain from even trying
an activity because their perception
of it, or their previous experience
with it, leads them to believe it is
too hard.
INTENSITY
AS A VARIABLE:
Attaining
physical fitness follows the FITT
principle. FITT
is the acronym that represents the variables
that can be manipulated and individualized
to meet various training needs. The
letters in FITT stand for frequency,
intensity, time, and
type of activity.
|
Frequency
(F) refers to the number of times per
week an activity is performed. The original
American College of Sports Medicine's
(ACSM) position in 1990 suggested we
perform some form of cardiovascular-based
activity 3-5 times per week. Their position
was established after the review of
numerous well-documented scientific
sources (1).
The intensity
(I) of activity performed should be
between 60% – 90% of maximal heart
rate. The suggested time
(T) for continuous and sustained physical
activity is between 20–60 minutes
or more. The type
of exercise (T) recommended is aerobic,
and one that predominately uses the
large muscle groups. Good examples include
jogging, swimming, x-c skiing, bicycling,
brisk walking, and dancing.
The art of individualized exercise
programming, in part, depends on adjusting
the 4 variables. This concept of adjusting
variables rose in importance when statistics
revealed American people's fitness levels
had not increased after the guidelines
were established. Although the ACSM
guidelines were flexible, many thought
they were too aggressive, thus resulting
in low adherence. Based on numerous
observational studies and data from
the Center of Disease Control (CDC),
an association was observed between
reductions in chronic diseases and increases
in leisure time physical activity. We
typically wouldn't think a leisure time
activity would elicit the same health
benefits as hard or even moderately
hard physical efforts. However, to realize
health benefits American adults don't
need to play hard 5 times a week. Less
will do. Thus, new physical activity
recommendations developed by the CDC
and ACSM organizations led to the following
statement:
"Every
US adult should accumulate 30 minutes
or more of moderate intensity physical
activity on most, preferably all, days
of the week. This recommendation emphasizes
the benefits of moderate intensity physical
activity and activity that can be accumulated
in relatively short bouts. Adults who
engage in moderate intensity, i.e. enough
to expend approximately 200 calories
a day can expect many of the health
benefits, described herein." (2)
Ways
to gauge intensity
Okay, so the old ACSM guidelines refer
to intensity as a percentage of maximal
heart rate, and the revised guidelines
refer to intensity as moderate effort,
and even suggest how many calories should
be expended relative to a moderate effort.
So, let's take a look at several ways
to gauge exercise intensity. In addition,
let's do a little bit of number crunching
to figure out the relationship between
calorie expenditure and exercise intensity.
1) Maximal
heart rate
Maximal
heart rate (MaxHR) is a widely used
method to determine exercise intensity.
The formula is: 220 minus age in years
equals a predicted heart rate maximum
in beats per minute. According to ACSM
guidelines, exercising at an intensity
of between 60-90% is the preferred range.
For example, a 40 year old who wants
to workout at the low end of the recommended
range would follow this formula: 220
- 40 = 180 MaxHR, 180 (MaxHR) x .60
= 108 beats per minute (bpm). Find a
pulse at the carotid artery or at the
radial artery by counting the number
of times the heart pulses or beats in
a minute.
There are many reasons why MaxHR
is not used universally. However, it
is widely used in conjunction with other
methods. It is a useful method for generally
healthy adults, but has its limitations
with deconditioned and highly conditioned
individuals, as well as limitations
with some modes of activity. Highly
conditioned athletes need to know specific
heart rates during intense interval
training (which incorporates high intensity
work cycles with lower range of intensity
rest cycles). A deconditioned individual
may be on a medication which interferes
with heart rate response. Swimming,
due to the hydrostatic
pressure of the water and the exaggerated
arms movements above the head, may elicit
lower than accurate heart rate responses.
The exaggerated arms movements performed
in aerobic dance or step benching may
also produce inaccurate heart rate responses.
2) Heart
rate reserve or Karvonan formula
A more reliable method of determining
an exercise intensity range, and one
which accommodates various fitness level
differences among participants, is the
Karvonan
formula, also called the heart rate
reserve method. You’ll need to
know your resting heart rate (RHR) for
this calculation. RHR reflects your
heart rate during a rested and quiet
state. RHR would ideally be taken immediately
after waking in the morning. Resting
heart rate decreases as the heart becomes
a more fit muscle. The Karvonan
formula uses heart rate reserve
(HRR) to find target heart rate (THR).
Below is an example:
Age:
40 yrs
RHR: 68 bpm
Desired intensity: 70% of HRR ----> |
220
- age = MaxHR
MaxHR - RHR = HRR
HRR(intensity%) + RHR = THR ----> |
220 - 40 = 180 MaxHR
180 MaxHR - 68 RHR = 112 HRR
112 HRR(70%) + 68RHR = 146 THR |
The calculated value of 146 bpm represents
70% of this individual's HRR, which
is considered moderate exercise intensity.
3) Talk
Test
The talk test is an easy gauge of
exercise intensity that uses just what
it says - talk. The premise is that
if one can carry on a conversation while
working out, the intensity is not high
enough to be heart challenging. On the
other hand, gasping for air and not
being able to speak a word is too vigorous
an intensity and really isn't a fun
way to exercise. You should be able
to breathe comfortably and string a
couple of words together throughout
the aerobic exercise. Ask your friends,
even those who love to exercise, if
piecing together a conversation is a
more pleasurable way to exercise than
gasping for air.
4) Borg's
RPE Scale
The Rating
of Perception of Effort (RPE) is
another easy way to gauge intensity
of aerobic activity. Swedish psychologist
Gunnar Borg, in a rigorous scientific
manner, developed a measurement tool
in the form of a category scale. Ratings
on the scale depend on the interaction
of sensory, cognitive, emotional, and
cardiopulmonary cues, as well as musculoskeletal
functions and psychosocial factors.
Two of the most common RPE scales used
by exercise professionals are Borg's
1 – 10 Perceived Exertion Rating
Scale and Borg's 6 – 20 Perceived
Exertion Scale.
The 1
-10 Perceived Exertion Rating
scale matches a number to one's
perception of effort during exercise
(see below). The 1 - 10 scale
represents a scale ranging from
"very weak" physical
effort to "extremely strong."
We can easily understand that
5 is mid-way between 1 and 10.
1. very weak
2. weak (light)
3. moderate
4. somewhat strong
5. strong (heavy)
6.
7. very strong
8.
9.
10. extremely strong
|
Borg's 6-20 Perceived
Exertion Scale is a 15-graded
scale that ranges from 6 - 20
(see below). An intensity eliciting
the feeling of wanting to vomit
would probably be a "20"
for most of us. This scale is
determined to be linear with pulse
rate, and is based on the premise
that pulse rate is a good indicator
of heart rate and general physical
strain.
6.
7. very, very light
8.
9. very light
10.
11. fairly light
12.
13. somewhat hard
14.
15. hard
16.
17. very hard
18.
19. very, very hard
20. |
Generally, RPE is a very appropriate
method to gauge intensity
once the method is practiced
a couple of times and well-understood
by the exerciser. It is especially
appropriate for those exercisers
who do not have a typical
heart rate response to exercise,
including pregnant, elderly,
and medicated people, and/or
those with heart conditions
(3). |
|
5)
METS
Another way to gauge the intensity
of exercise is by using the concept
of metabolic
equivalent or MET. One MET
equals the energy expenditure
associated while at rest, generally
1.2 kcal/min. Intensity of exercise,
expressed in METS, can be described
as a multiple of resting energy
expenditure. For example, if someone
is exercising at an intensity
of 5 METS, they are expending
energy at 5 times their resting
metabolic rate.
A comprehensive activity classification
system that codes physical activity
by purpose (ex: sport, leisure,
housework, occupation) and by
energy cost is referenced in the
following example of how to determine
caloric expenditure for a given
activity
(4). The
compendium is a highly reliable
and varied table that was the
product of numerous physical activity
expenditure lists.
|
Example: An individual canoeing at
5 METS
would expend about 6 kcals per minute
(1.2kcals x 5 METS x 1 min). For general
purposes, consider a reference individual
weighing 70 kg (154lbs). So, if you
weigh quite a bit more or less than
70kg, the caloric expenditure should
be slightly adjusted. Knowing the exercisers
body weight in kg will yield a more
accurate estimation of energy expenditure.
Use the following MET equivalent, 1kcal/kg
body weight/hour, to determine energy
expenditure during a 30 minute canoeing
activity for the given values:
Given: Body weight 60 kg
Canoeing at 5 METS (see compendium)
30 minutes
(5 METS x 60 kg) x (30min/60min) = 150
kcal for 30 min
The following are various activities,
chosen from the compendium, determined
to be at a 5 MET intensity level:
Low impact aerobic dance
Operating a punch press
Walking downstairs or standing carrying
a 25-49 lb object
Playing cricket or bowling
Playing golf and pulling the clubs
Skateboarding
Snorkeling
Canoeing
Skiing downhill with a light effort
Fishing from the river bank
Hunting small game such as rabbit,
raccoon, squirrel |
That
was a lot of information on exercise
intensity! Hopefully it has refreshed
your understanding of the "I"
in FITT. Refer back to the questions
posed at the beginning of this article.
I imagine it will now be easier
for you to find out enough about
the individual asking the "exercise"
question to be able to construct
an appropriate response. "How
hard do you have to work out?"
Educate the exerciser about the
moderate training zone according
to one of the intensity gauges presented
above. To the individual that perceives
exercise as too hard, educate them
about leisure activities or occupational
activities that yield the same MET
value as a sport! |
How many calories does a brisk walk
for 15 minutes around the local school
yard playground burn? Now you have the
tools to figure that out! Also, what
do the numbers on the new heart rate
monitor mean? What does MET mean on
the treadmill? You've got the basics
now!
Thanks for spending time with me. I'd
be happy to answer any questions you
have via e-mail.
References:
1) The recommended quantity and quality
of exercise for developing and maintaining
cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness
in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc
22:265-274, 1990.
2) Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell
WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, Buchner D,
Ettinger W, Heath GW, King AC. Physical
Activity and public health: a recommendation
from the Centers of Disease Control
and Prevention and the American College
of Sports Medicine. JAMA 273:402-407,
1995.
3) Noble, B and Robertson, R. 1996.
Perceived Exertion. Human Kinetics,
Champaign, Ill.
4) Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leo AS,
et al. Compendium of Physical Activities:
classification of energy costs of human
physical activities. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 1:71-80, 1993.
|