Secondary Physical Education
October 29, 2001, Vol. 3, No.20

CONFERENCE/WORKSHOP CALENDAR

 Editorial

I have begun my fall semester by adventuring outside the world of physical education to instructional technology.  I am working as part of our Preparing Tomorrow's Teaching for Using Technology (PT3) team.  I work with preservice and in-service teachers from all educational disciplines in an attempt to provide training and technical support for the integration of technology.  

I am learning a tremendous amount from our friendly neighbors in the math and science department.  I do believe that the feeling is mutual.  They introduced me to motion probes and mobile, graphing heart monitors.  In turn they have expanded their perspective on the potential use of PDAs, streaming video, and the use of Handy Sheets web site for student homework or assessment.

Next we are going to attempt to create some case studies of technology-rich inquiry projects.  I am eager to beginning work on this project so I can make application to physical education.

Presently, the South Carolina Physical Education Assessment Program has five multimedia CD-ROMs available.  Two, cover assessment at the high school level, two cover assessment on the elementary level. A middle school assessment CD is expected to be released in January.  These CDs contain assessment rubrics and score sheets for various sporting activities.  The information is set in an interactive format so audio and video can be displayed.

A fifth CD is called Awesome Volleyball.  Former, Brazilian Junior National Team Coach, Gylton DaMatta, is featured on the CD.  This an interactive instructional format, recommended for teachers or coaches working with beginning volleyball players.  Progression for skills development and lead up games are included.  

For information on any of these projects, please feel free to contact me and I will forward you the information.

The school year is already one quarter finished.  If we only had time for all of the projects we want to do!  

The writings in this issue are related to these projects and the importance of physical activity in and out of physical education.

Darla Castelli
Secondary Section Editor






Join more than 10,000 subscribers currently receiving a biweekly e-mail posting of the latest PELINKS4U news.

Enter your email address below, then click the 'Sign Up' button:

 



Fitnessgram Testing Accuracy

Fitnessgram testing is a valid, reliable why to attain health-fitness information about our students.  When students are pre/post tested, this information can provide an accurate assessment of your student's fitness level.  The information can be used to set goals and for instruction.

Despite all of the benefits, the results of fitness testing can be very misleading if technical errors are not addressed.  When administering the test the protocols and directions must be strictly adhered to.  For example, when executing the curl up a student's hands must remain in contact with the floor the entire time.

If a student's hand lifts off of the floor (as pictured above) then that is considered an error.  On the second error the test is completed.  Often these types of errors go undetected and thus scores are embellished.

It is impossible for us to see all the errors, so train your student to help you identify those errors.  Accuracy of test scores is dependent upon it.



Questions to Ask, or
Thoughts to Share?

Click Here!



 Issues of Video Taping in Physical Education

The benefits of using videotaping in physical education are unheralded.  The possible uses are limitless.  For years we have known that video analysis of human performance leads to refinement and increased performance.  Coaches looking for an edge spend hours analyzing "tapes."  Yet, in this day and age, we must use caution when introducing a video or still camera to our classrooms.

Many school districts now have policies addressing the use of media in classrooms.  The purpose of this discussion is to make some suggestions on how to introduce videotaping into your classroom.  

  1. Find out what your school district policy is for videotaping.  Be sure to follow what ever guidelines that have been established.  Years ago, it required an appeal to the school board before we could use videotape of students in an AAHPERD presentation.  The prevalence has increased but guidelines remain stringent.
  2. Obtain parental permission to videotape, as soon as, a student joins your class.  A "Release for Videotaping" is fairly simple to make.  Construct the document then have it approved by the school administration.  The administration may want to show it to the school lawyer before they agree to its use.
  3. Be specific about your intended use of the video.  Videotaping for the purpose of having students watch their own performance, is justifiable and a reasonable request.  Using student video to create a multimedia CD for profit, takes on a new level of justification.  Additionally, anything intended to be published to the World Wide Web should be clearly denoted.  Parents deserve to know where pictures of their children are going, for what purpose, and how you are going to attempt to protect their anonymity.
  4. Use the camera frequently.  Making videotaping part of your daily routine justifies its presences.  Link the videotaping to national and state standards.  This demonstrates its essential presence in the classroom.

Start by visiting these websites for comprehensive guidelines and suggestions.  Examples are included at these sites.

NCSA website

BHAM website

*We obtained permission to place this photo on this website.

 


 Physical Activity Contacts

In South Carolina there are four state mandated standards, or performance indicators.  The third is related to students participating in regular physical activity outside of physical education.

Student contracts are a way to be encouraging student to participate in regular physical activity outside of physical education.  Contracts are a written agreement requiring students to participate in physical activity on a daily basis.  Signatures from parents, coaches, church group leaders, outing club leaders, etc. ensure that students have participated in activity outside of school.

Introduction of this concept is not always initially received positively, especially among high school students.  The response is usually, "this is so easy, all I have to do is write down that I go to practice every day and have my coach sign it."  While still other students say, "this is not fair, I am not a jock.  You can not make me exercise when I am at home."  

The contracts have received tremendous support from parents who are looking for ways to send their adolescent children "out to play."  Some parents have gone so far as participating with their children.  Going to the school to play tennis, running around the track, or walking the dog together has been a wonderful, unexpected outcome.

Usually contracts last for a semester or a quarter; requiring six to nine straight weeks of daily exercise.  There are guidelines for what is acceptable.  A broad range of activities are accepted, but the daily requirement is only flexible with confirmation from parents.  For example, if a student was sick and unable to exercise, a parent would right a note.  The number of excused days coincides with the attendance policy of the school.  So, if you are only allowed to miss three days in a quarter, the same holds true for the physical activity contract.

Community businesses have also caught on to the idea and offer ways which students can meet their physical activity contracts.  For example, a local gym offered free passes or reduced rates to those students with contracts.  Such offerings motivated the schools.

Starting with the next quarter, design a physical activity contract for your students and treat its completion as homework, for part of their grade.  Be sure to request telephone numbers and signatures so you can confirm the students participation in these physical activities.

 SOFIT Teacher Challenge

In our last issue you read about the importance of physical activity in the prevention of childhood obesity.  The purpose of this article is to entice you to take the SOFIT physical activity challenge.

For two years I have been working with preservice, undergraduate physical education majors, at the University of South Carolina.  While teaching a class, entitled Teaching Health Related Fitness, I stressed the importance of creating lessons that required students to be physically active at least 50% of the time.  The rise in incidence of juvenile diabetes and childhood obesity, suggests that we be more conscientious about how much physical activity actually takes place within our own physical education classes.  It seems like such a simple task to plan for students to be moderate to vigorously physically active (MVPA) for more than 50% of the class period.

Undergraduates claim that it is easy, (much simpler than rocket science), so I took the challenge to illustrate a point. I created a model, integrated fitness lesson for sixth graders.  The objectives:

  1.  To have students work in their target heart zone (moderate to vigorously) for at least 50% of the time.
  2. To introduce the racket sport defensive tactic of returning to "home base." 
  3. To review the cues of the forehand and smash (which were taught in previous lessons). 

With the undergraduates acting as my students, I taught and videotaped the lesson.  After the cool down and closure, the students still dripping with sweat, sat in front of a TV/VCR and coded the lesson.

We assumed that our middle school did not have heart monitors available, so we used the System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT)  (McKenzie, Sallis, & Nader, 1991) to identify how much time was actually spent participating in physical activity.  A modification of the SOFIT coding sheet was used.  We each watched a student for one minute, then circled the appropriate number under each of the three columns (Student activity, Lesson context, Teacher behavior).  For the next minute we selected a different student to watch, and so forth.

What were our conclusions?  The lesson context had meet the teacher objectives.  The teacher behavior promoted fitness, appropriately managed, and generally instructed racket sport tactics and skills.  Unfortunately, the lesson, which was designed to exceed the 50% physical activity time, barely made met that criteria.  Our conclusions were that attaining the objective of students being in MVPA for at least 50% of the physical education is not easy.  It took an extremely conscientious part on the teacher and the students to attain that.  It also required tremendous organization.  Minimizing the amount of time spent in transition and management were critical.

Our suggestion, take the SOFIT teacher challenge.  Plan your best lesson, videotape it, and then have you and a friend code the lesson using the SOFIT coding sheet.  I hope your results exceed your objectives. The concept is not a new one, but this "check up" will help you identify if you are continuing to meet your objectives.   

 Contribute YOUR Ideas

If you have ideas, comments, letters to share, or questions about particular topics, please email one of the following Secondary PE Section Editors:

Jon Poole

Bart Cagle

Darla Castelli

Isobel Kleinman


 
Help to support quality physical education and health education by contributing to this site.



  Archives

Please let your colleagues know about PELINKS4U, and remember you can catch up on a year's worth of news in our PE Archives.