continued
from previous column.
In an article written by Mowling,
Brock, Eiler, and Rudisill (2004), the authors identify six barriers
to motivation, and also provide tips on how to alleviate these
barriers. One barrier is intrinsic motivation.
Intrinsic motivation is related to the student's view of themselves,
and their performance. In an interview with elementary students,
the authors found that the students disliked exercise, and associated
exercise with not having fun. The students said that they enjoyed
classes when they were able to play games and run around. The
authors provide suggestions to aid in eliminating this barrier:
Also associated with intrinsic motivation is the fact that students
tend to compare their own performance against their classmates
performance, which can lead to the belief that being good, or
not good, in motor skills is an inherent and permanent trait.
However, with practice a students motor skills will improve. Physical
educators are encouraged to dispel the myth that being good, or
not, is a permanent trait (Rink, 2004). Rink (2004) provides five
themes that educators can add as part of the curriculum, which
are as follows:
 |
How do
people get better at motor skills? |
 |
What
is good performance? |
 |
What
stages do individuals pass through to become proficient at
motor skills? |
 |
What kind
of practices facilitates learning? |
 |
Will learning
one motor skill help a person learn another motor skill? (p.
32) |
One thing that Rake mentions, that I believe to be essential,
is to make students feel comfortable being a beginner. At times,
it has been my experience to want to be as good as a professional
player, or to be as good as my friends in trying something for
the first time. And then, I am often disappointed with my performance.
Rink (2004) suggests educators describe the characteristics of
being a beginner, provide information on the reasons why some
students may be better than others, and information on how someone
can improve their performance. Doing this can allow a student
to view their performance realistically, or assuage their feelings
if they do not perform as well as they'd hoped to.
In relation to the varying levels of performance among a classroom
full of students, the idea of including students in the activity
decision making process was talked about in one article. Chatopius
& Emmanuel (2003) did a study in Athens with fifth and sixth
graders on the Mosston and Ashworth (2002) spectrum of teaching
styles. They focused in on the style E objective, where students
were included in the decision making process of activities. This
focus allowed varying of levels of difficulty for a task, and
students would evaluate their own performance. Since this had
never been done before in a classroom, the authors wanted to observe
difficulties that might arise, and how they would be handled.
At first, students stayed in groups, and then the groups started
to compete against each other. Because of this adjustments were
made, such as emphasizing individual decisions, and hanging charts
to remind students of their roles.
At the end of four weeks, students started to make independent
decisions, not as a group, and were willing to try different levels
before making their final decision. The authors state that, "Accomplishing
the goals of the inclusion style requires making sure students
know their role expectations, and above all, providing them with
opportunities to live up to their expectations (p.38)."
Whether you're creating activities that have meaning to students
outside of the classroom environment, or whether you're dispelling
myths on motor skill performance, motivation can be fostered through
information and support provided by educators. You have the power
to influence a student's perception and enthusiasm about physical
education classes, now, and in the future.
references |